Recently
on my blog, I asked if it was possible to write a bad novel about
either of the World Wars, since the material is so heart-wrenchingly
emotional that it's surely impossible to fail to engage the reader. I
was thinking this while trapped in the horror of the trenches (or under
them, as the tunnel-diggers of the novel are) in Birdsong, but now I've
finished the book I can see one possible way to blemish a war novel:
structure it like Birdsong. Everything in the book that takes place
during the war is phenomenal, and the first hundred pre-war pages I
could just about stomach, as they were clearly pertinent to the plot and
emotions of the main character while the war is in session. On the way
home from work I had to stop reading the book I was so worried that I
would burst into tears at the train station, and I thought I might have
to put it aside for a few weeks while I recovered. It's brutal,
beautiful, and staggeringly affecting. But I cannot for the life of me
imagine why Sebastian Faulks thought it would be a good idea to set
about a tenth of the book in England, 1978, following a bunch of
completely unlikeable tossers.
To
be fair, I can understand reasons why you might want to go into the
future: to juxtapose the horrors of war with the mundanity of normal
life; to show how easily forgotten people's actions are after they die;
to depress you completely that the heroic actions of main character
Stephen Wraysford during the Great War led to the birth of a rubbish
character who has no redeeming qualities whatsoever; but surely these
could have been covered in five pages, rather than ten times that amount
of flouncing around? The war bits of Birdsong are easily five-star
material but the 1979-stuff is one star at best, and I can't fathom why
Faulks would want to cheapen his novel with this tripe. It's one of
those where I can see the point of what he's done, but I don't enjoy
reading it. It's almost as puzzling to me as why the Arctic Monkeys
included the horrible Brick by Brick on their latest album when they can
write amazing songs for fun. Maybe in some way they were both done in
order to make the words and songs around them more powerful and
important, and if they were, they did their job.
Ha. Oh this did make me laugh. There is no doubt that Birdsong is both an impressive and important novel but both my brother and I felt exactly the same way about the end - having a bit of a 'who cares?!' reaction to the birth scene, random adulterous relationship and the random dude who is the one to savour the poignant bird-taking-flight moment at the end. Wtf?!
ReplyDeleteHa, yeah it's all very strange, don't know what he was thinking. It kind of makes sense but it's (way) more literary than entertaining!
ReplyDelete