To
say that William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury is a difficult novel
is something of an understatement: when you've ploughed the first sixty
pages and have no clue what's going on it's very tempting to give up,
and when the first part ends and instead of a breather you're presented
with something even more difficult it's almost painful to keep going,
but to reach the end of the book is a beautiful experience, and well
worth the headache. Fury was written in the 1920s, when
stream-of-consciousness writing was all the rage, and guys like Joyce
and gals like Woolf were fiendishly trying to make their books as
impenetrable as possible, in the hope that a hundred years later people
would think they were great novelists but run screaming at the thought
of having to read their books. This plan worked well. Faulkner was a
similar kind of chap from the USA, and wrote his masterpiece chronicling
the disintegration and decay of a formerly well-to-do Southern family
in four parts: the first written by a mentally disabled man-child who
flits back and forth and back again through numerous time periods
whenever any tiny detail catches his memory's attention, and the only
thing to help the reader is a line in italics when the focus shifts to a
different time period. The first part is set over thirty years and
features around fifteen different time lines, and if that's not hard
enough two of the characters have the same name. Apparently, Faulkner
intended originally for the different time periods to be printed in
different ink colours to make things easier to follow, but they didn't
have the technology to do this.
After
a few pages of trying to follow the action, I realised the best way to
read was to just go for it, let the scenes slide past me and head for
the finish line, and hopefully eventually all would become clear. And by
the time I got to part three, hard shapes started to appear out of the
misty background, and I saw just how remarkable a piece of writing this
is. In a similar way to the stream-of-consciousness employed at the
beginning of the novel, my mind is jogged to realise that in fact I did
understand certain things from the first parts of the novel, I just
didn't know I understood them until they were placed in context.
Although it seems that nothing going on makes sense and none of it is
going into your brain, it really is, and you just have to enjoy the ride
and get towards the end and some clarity. The entire thing is a complex
metaphor for the mind, thoughts and memories swirling around and
catching when a couple fit together. On finishing it, my first thought
was that I'm really looking forward to reading the book again in a few
months when the dust has settled in my brain, in a similar way to how a
mind-boggling film like Donnie Darko begs a second viewing. In fact, I
think I could read Fury again and again, each time fitting more pieces
into the jigsaw, but because of its fragmentary style, never quite
completing the puzzle. The Sound and the Fury is truly an amazing book.
Ah - we almost ended up reading this for Manchester Book Club but it was overruled in favour of 'The Last of the Savages' by Jay McInerney. (Don't ask me how or WHY that happened!) I really do fancy it but will now make sure I save for the right mood. Sounds a bit like The Master and Margarita. I'm chuffed I read it, it was fabulous and I feel a better person for it, but I was confused and perplexed throughout.....and didn't understand most of it.
ReplyDeleteBe prepared for a slog! It's well worth it though
ReplyDelete